Deathdream, 1974 – ★★★★

Having recently picked up 101 films fantastic bluray set of Bob Clarks Horror offerings, I literally had no idea what I was getting myself into when I checked out ‘Deathdream’, the film he made immediately before ‘Black Christmas’ and whats here is a definite jump in quality over ‘Children Shouldn’t Play With Dead Things’ in terms of scripting and vibe. but it’s a film that isnt without its faults.

The plot revolves around a family who’s son is fighting in Vietnam, when news reaches them that their sons been killed in action, their grief is immeasurable. However, shortly after news of his death reaches them. the son (Andy) miraculously turns up at his parents doorstep! But while physically he’s there, mentally he could not be further gone. And as the film progresses we begin to realise that whoever or whatever is occupying Andys old room, is most definitely NOT Andy.

The first thing that hit me with this movie is just how oppressive and bleak the tone and vibe is. everything is very heavily in ‘pressure cooker’ mode for most of the runtime, and that feeling of distinct discomfort and just…broad oddness is honestly fantastically captivating. In the same way Andrzej Żuławski’s ‘Possession’ or Matthew Holness’ ‘Possum’ deliberately create an environment within their films aimed at totally alienating the viewer on purpose to help better sell the unsettling narratives they’ve created. ‘Deathdream’ manages to be thoroughly unpleasent in it’s ambience but deeply captivating at the same time.

The Scripts really solidly crafted, with a clean and clear 3 act structure thats evenly paced and doesnt give up it’s hand too early in telling you exactly whats going on. Its a psychodrama with supernatural horror elements and, to my mind at least is a solid symbolic piece on PTSD and its effects on soldiers returning from Nam. it’s maybe a little heavy handed in it’s execution, but it paces out little crumbs of information at periodic intervals to create something altogether tonally and narratively interesting.

We have some fantastically written characters, and the scripts decision to introduce us to these people as the ‘all american’ nuclear family style trope, only to see them all slowly turn on each other, lose their minds and break apart over their processing of ‘loss’ (in every sense of the word) I thought was fantasitcally handled and was made all the more impressive by the scriptwriters decision to play things very nuanced in the first instance, before flipping the switch into full melodrama by the third act. it really is some wonderful character writing and the development we see across the runtime is a perfect example of how to develop characters in a modestly paced fashon.

My only criticism in fact is that this sometimes does get a little *too* slow for it’s own good. a well steeped atmospheric picture is one thing, but this does sag a little in the middle while the family are still trying to get a read on what exactly is going on with Andy. It never quite goes slow enough to make me lose interest. But it did get dangerously close in places.

The cine and direction are polished, refined and it’s clear Bob’s honed his skills since his last horror film. This looks and feels a lot tighter in terms of it’s execution. and in particular, the way he utilises lighting has seen an absolute improvement over his last offering which was at times a little overly murky. Here, it’s grainy, it’s dark, but it never quite gets to the point where you struggle to see whats going on. Theres a clear stylized vision on hand, and I found it fascinating to see the early signs of stylised shot compositions and colour usage that will really come into their own when ‘Black Christmas’ debuts later this same year.

In short; visually, it’s maybe a little too brown in colouring for my taste, but this is clearly an offering from a director whos now well underway as a creator and is beginning to work beyond standard functionality. it’s a great offering.

Performance wise, John Marley is ASTOUNDING as Andys dad Charles. Introduced as a loving family man, across the runtime we see the cracks in this familys foundations raise their heads and as Andys return begins to trawl up more and more questions and Charles begins to put together the pieces of this puzzle. we see him breakdown, and John really is utterly astounding in showing the level of devestation and grief that comes with the loss of a family member.

Inversely Lynn Carlin also astounds as Andy’s mum Christine. She shows the other side of grief. the side that basically puts a wall up and pretends it isnt happening. and again, its a master class of a performance because we see this woman slowly realise that their son is doing horrific things, but because of how protective she is of Andy, she cant bring herself to accept it, ultimately also leading to breakdown but in a totally contrasting way to John Marleys performance, and the pair play off each other phenominally.

That is of course not to play down Richard Backus as Andy, who gives a genuinely sinister and unpleasent performance that, while I wouldnt go as far as to say was ‘one of the greats’ almost certainly lent to that sense of unease. The fact that we never *quite* get a full clock on him as a character really helped only further push what performance he DID leave here further into fantastic terratory.

This also marks the start of one of Bob Clarks signature styles as a director, in the use of absence of sound or scoring to help punctuate sequences. There are tons of moments dotted across this where, in other films, they’d use scoring to try and win the audience over. But here, all we hear is the diagetic sounds. the wind outside, the creak of a rocking chair, the sound of cars driving outside. it’s subtle, but goes a long way to helping set that isolated uneasy tone. And while I think it gets used to it’s fullest potential in ‘Black Christmas’ it absolutely has some fantastic moments here.

All in all? I really enjoyed this one and could highly recommend it! It’s a touch on the slow side (even clocking in at 87 minutes) but it’s just a really well crafted and oppressive horror movie that I feel would pair up really well with something like Norman J Warrens ‘Prey’ or Matthew Holness’ “Possum” It’s not Clarks best, but its a DAMN good effort.

source https://letterboxd.com/tytdreviews/film/deathdream/

Halloween Is Grinch Night, 1977 – ★★★

A prequel to ‘How the Grinch Stole Christmas’ made 11 years AFTER that film and despite being known as ‘Halloween is Grinch Night’ there isn’t a single mention of Halloween anywhere in this thing.

Instead we have the story of a young boy named Ucheria who, while on a trip to the bathroom during a sour sweet smelling storm ends up being blown directly into the path of The Grinch! Who’s heading down to Whoville while the storm rages with a ‘Paraphinalia wagon’ to unleash Untold horrors on Whoville. (Apparently he can only do this on storm days)

Honestly? It’s kind of middling. I don’t think it’s objectively bad, and it has that much loved Dr. Seuss style well and truly in tact in terms of visuals ans art direction.

But it’s just kind of a ‘nothing’ story. The Grinch isn’t particularly grumpy here, in fact he’s delighted for the most part, there’s a lot of repetition, the pacings kind of on the slow side…it feels like a book that shouldn’t have been adapted to TV…and that’s because it WAS a book originally that ended up being adapted for ABC.

It’s not interesting enough as a plot to really hold my attention and when the credits rolled I legitimately was like ‘Well…that was 30 minutes’. If it disappeared tomorrow I don’t think I’d be that bothered.

The performances are okay enough, not as good as the first film, they don’t really animate their voices all that much, it sounds ‘off brand’ to me. I think Karloffs absence hits this thing quite hard.

As does the lack of a *spark* behind the soundtrack. It sounds like ‘Grinch who stole christmas’ and that’s the problem, it sounds like a sound alike. Like a score TRYING to capture the success of the original. And as such it all comes across as ‘samey’ and uninspired.

I was surprised that this thing even existed quite honestly, but having seen it, I don’t think I’ve missed out on anything over the years. We have a time killer of a script married up to some colourful and solid cine and direction. But this thing feels wholley unoriginal. It’s nothing more than a vibrant Yawn.

source https://letterboxd.com/tytdreviews/film/halloween-is-grinch-night/

Monsters Crash the Pajama Party, 1965 – ★★★½

I’ve had a soft spot for ‘Monsters Crash the Pajama Party’ ever since I first heard about the film way back in 2009 when I caught James Rolfe discussing it as part of his ‘Monster Madness’ series. This was the first film I ever imported from another country because it’s release from Something Weird Video was something really quite next level. a smogesboard of clips, extracts and hidden gems scattered across half a dozen ‘clickable’ pages all hidden as easter eggs. The combined sum offering a MORE than in depth exploration of the old ‘Spook Shows’ which ran from the late 1920’s through to the late 60s.

This short film is an element of the spook show experience and would have mainly been used to give the performers time behind the scenes to change costumes, prepare props or just generally set up their next live act. It was also designed to help set the tone and vibe for whatever act was coming next.

This is a short but sweet horror comedy piece about some sorority girls spending a night in a *supposedly* haunted house that was formerly home to a mad doctor who used to kidnap teenagers and turn them into animals…Only, it transpires that there actually IS a mad doctor in the basement who HAS turned a teen into a giant Ape and he’s looking to kidnap the girls to continue his experiments. Scooby Doo level hilarity ensues.

And…This absolutely isnt a particularly well made film. Cheap and cheerful is probably the best way I can describe it, the scripts super basic. it’s all melodramatic padding all the way through because the main plot of the film is basically “girls creep around a haunted house while being slowly picked off and taken to a lab by the Ape”. As such all the dialoue is fluff pieces just designed to help set the mood and tone, but nothing thats ACTUALLY said has ANY bearing on the plot.

It’s basically all here just to build to a moment in the closing minutes of the film where, had you been watching this in a theater. The mad doctor would send the Ape out into the audience to cause trouble and kidnap a planted ‘stooge’ who’d then get dragged out of the theater and *seemingly* into the movie. Thats it. Thats the whole point of the film. it’s a build up to a physical happening, and its designed to be filler for the live acts. It’s not ‘The Godfather.’

Directions basic, but functional, it does have a bit of a style about it and pretty much all the elements work together about as well as they could do. Cast directions almost non existent. I believe the director may have told the cast what he wanted, but I dont think it was much more nuanced than ‘Your a mad doctor, be crazy and over the top’ What im saying is, I dont think the director had nuanced conversations about actor placement, prop usage and motivations.

The cine is actually pretty impressive for a low/no budget feature, they’ve dressed the set spaces effectively given their budget and everything is dusty and cobweb ridden, as such they use that musty/dusty quality to their favour by keeping things low lit, moody and as such it gives the film a bit of a smokey quality. they also surprisingly use coloured lighting gels. Im certain the blue lighting used is only to show that it’s nighttime outside and that no more thought was put to it beyond that. But because it absolutely DOESNT look like that, it actually gives the film a bit of a faux arty quality which is pretty decent.

Oranges, Blues and Pinks are the flavour of the day, the whole thing doesnt look amazing. but for low budget cinema, its not terrible.

The performances are hamtastic. this is a big goofy dumb 30 minute schlocky comedy horror movie. and barring our sorority girls and their boyfriends who are considered ‘the foil’ here, the mad doctor, his henchmen and the ape are all full on scene chewing, melodramatic ham machines. they are SO over the top its almost overwhelming and I absolutely loved it when they were on screen. Camp to the nth degree, I found them SO watchable.

The soundtracks weird too, it’s plinky plonky early synth sounds, it doesnt suit the film at all, but weirdly I find it kind of charming. and absolutely a throwback to a much more experimental era.

All in all, this really isnt a great movie. I dont expect anyone to stand up and bat for this thing. But I personally thought it was just big goofy campy fun and a fine enough way to kill 30 minutes. I’d have loved to have seen it played out, as intended, as part of a bigger live production. But even isolated, I thought it was charming and charismatic despite how short it was. If you get 30 minutes and want a kooky, spooky campy 60’s spooky time. Check this one out. its…SO weird.

source https://letterboxd.com/tytdreviews/film/monsters-crash-the-pajama-party/

Liquid A$$ets, 1982 – ★★

I dont know if I just wasnt in the right headspace for this movie or what, but I just…didnt really get anything out of it. The bulk of the film is around a group rehersing a play for some kind of grand opening, theres a thriller element that comes in late at the end. The films top heavy on Oral and the sex scenes dont really do anything out of the ordinary on the direction or cine standfront. I didnt need to see Ron Jeremy have sex with a blow up doll, while commenting on the aesthetics of the blow up doll.

All in all, This was just a fairly standard erotic flick to me. It isnt the worst the 80s had to offer, in fact i’d say it was maybe a little above average for early 80’s adult features. But the direction is kind of flat and textbook, the cine was a little drab and uninspired, there wasnt much cast direction seemingly and other than a couple of zany moments, this film just kind of came across as a bit ‘mid’ to me.

source https://letterboxd.com/tytdreviews/film/liquid-aets/