Die Hard, 1988 – ★★★★

Well, a storm hit the UK today knocking my Internet out, and given my entire physical media collection (and player) are still boxed up due to a recent move I was stuck watching live TV tonight. And I timed it perfectly to catch ‘Die Hard’

Honestly not much to say that hasn’t been said already, it’s a much loved action thriller that’s deservedly praised for having a nice level of self awareness and charisma about itself, without fully going all in on the tropes that defined 80s action movies.

Bruce Willis and Alan Rickman absolutely delight across the runtime, it looks great, it’s written well, and the supporting cast understand the assignment.

The only solid criticism I have for it, is the first act is a bit lumpy and slow going. Great moments, just unevenly paced and it falters a bit until the heist actually starts going. But from there on in, it becomes a riot…quite literally.

As for the debate as to whether its a Christmas film or not? I’m honestly still on the fence. It’s a film that relishes the fact its a film set on Christmas eve and embraces Christmas music and the day itself for self aware snarkery (which is very much appreciated) however, the core themes and values one would associate with a ‘christmas’ movies are absolutely absent. If it wasn’t for the film itself reminding the audience that the film took place around christmas time, we’d really be non the wiser.

My gut tells me this is an unconventional christmas movie, but it IS a christmas movie…that being said, you won’t find it in MY top 5 christmas films anytime soon because of its lack of actual festivities barring puns, graffiti and a few choice needle drops…you guys do what you want is where I’m at with this one.

Great film, would recommend catching at least once. Yippie kai yay

source https://letterboxd.com/tytdreviews/film/die-hard/

NoAngels.com, 2000 – ★

A deathly dull Mockumentary from the lens of Charles Band featuring a gaggle of the ‘surrender cinema’ stable ‘NoAngels.com’ is the story of several women’s determination to launch an adult website during the apex of the 2000s ‘dot com’ Craze. And…that’s really all there is to say about this one.

I’m not entirely sure what the point of it was truthfully, the idea of a scripted fake documentary is *generally* that the story is more engaging than anything that could happen naturally…but here, it’s *too* straight cut, with only the occasional, incredibly painful planned shot and the clearly fake ‘drama’ pulling you out of a dreary piece about half a dozen girls going to the club and talking ‘branding opportunities’

The film gets SO fed up with itself, that half way in to the movie it becomes an advert for the ‘hustler store’ and ‘surrender cinemas’ self branded adult toy merch.

The pacing is chronically slow, the direction and cine are jittery and painful…not helped by the fact this was shot in DV wide-screen. But hasn’t been upscaled for streaming platforms. Meaning the copy on full moons streaming service and dvd is a ‘widescreen’ print for 4:3 tvs that hasn’t been recropped to ACTUALLY be widescreen for the digital release. Meaning the entire film has a huge black void surrounding it (a common issue for the less fondly remembered full moon titles…)

The characters arnt interesting, the softcore is basically non existent, the film seems to have lost the point of its own existence before it even really got started and the sound mix is atrocious. With thin tinny vocals that can BARELY be deciphered, getting hard mixed with random music, some copyrighted, others randomly incidental, but all super low quality.

I wasn’t expecting much from this going in, but even I was surprised how little titillation is ACTUALLY present in this movie and just HOW DULL it really truely is. Am absolute waste of 72 minutes. Don’t bother unless your a die hard ‘surrender cinema’ fan…and even then, I think you’ll struggle.

source https://letterboxd.com/tytdreviews/film/noangelscom/

The Wizard of Oz, 1939 – ★★★★

When I say ‘They dont make them like they used to’ this is the film im specifically referring to. One of the first films to utilize technicolor and what a marvel for the age it really truely was. The 1939 ‘Wizard of Oz’ is a marvellous family film that, while almost certainly dated in some of its less politically sound choices, is nontheless an enjoyable, colourful ride through the wonderful world of ‘Oz’.

What astounded me the most was really how fresh this film STILL feels almost 85 years since its release. while I cant say it looks ‘fresh’ in the face of modern 4k digital CGI and animation, it DOES look fresh from a live action perspective, and moreso; I feel like even modern audiences would find something to latch onto with this.

The scripts…imperfect, I think thats fair to say, its a little slow burn, but manages to keep the audience holding on by way of its VERY unusual aesthetic and imagery. I feel like the film overruns by about 10-15 minutes. Which, by chance is exactly how long (roughly) the sequence where Dorathy is captured by the wicked witch of the west and has to be rescued by the tin man, scarecrow and Lion takes. I’d have honestly been happy enough with a final confrontation with the wicked witch in the emeral city. But! the film feels the need to complicate itself at the final hurdle…which was a bit of a shame.

However, outside of that, we have a really solid time. The scripts dialogue choices are solid with plenty of quotable moments, most of which have been absorbed into modern media via cultural osmosis. The characters are a little basic, but well defined, the land of Oz is a spiriting place filled with curiosities and intreague. the act structuring up to the 3rd act is pretty straightforward and interesting.

Tonally, its campy fun. plenty of fun little musical numbers and because the characters are especially vibrant and animated, it leads to a number of semi slapsticky encounters which I really enjoyed.

The direction, for the time, is remarkable. Honestly; this is an incredible work showcasing the real potential of colour film, and the use of technicolour here REALLY takes things to the next level. I was amazed by the practical effects, the creativity that came into the city and worldbuilding and the costume design, all of which felt grand and intricate.

The cine too was rock solid, with some incredible ‘in camera’ effects, glorious rich and deep colour and surreal compositions that to this day continue to inspire film makers ranging from Tim Burton, to John Waters. compositions are significant. Its an incredible work.

Not to mention the astounding performances from Margret Hamilton, Judy Garland and our anthropomorphic trio. Who are all firing on all cylinders giving performances that very much defined their careers (which is incredibly bittersweet when you know the hardships that these actors went through in order to produce this film)

The musical elements are delightful, memorable and instantly reciteable. hits that carry on reinventing themselves WELL into the modern age. the incidental music is standout and distinctive to.

In short, barring some pacing issues and moments where this film gets a little TOO simplistic at times. I had a ball with this, I have fond memories of watching and rewatching this film on TV as a child on bonfire nights and around christmas time. and given it had been 22 years (at least!) since I last saw this. It felt surprisingly like slipping into a well worn and appreciated armchair.

If you’ve NEVER seen this before, I dont know how you’ll take it, but i’d like to think you’d love it. If you HAVE seen this before, and its been a while, go fix that.

Also; Toto was euthanized 3 days later…

source https://letterboxd.com/tytdreviews/film/the-wizard-of-oz-1939/

One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, 1975 – ★★★★½

An Academy Award darling, ‘One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest’ was a record breaker back in its day, winning Best director, Best Screenplay adaptation, Best supporting actor, Best Actor, Best editing, Best score and many MANY more. and given its been AT LEAST 10-15 years since I last watched it, it was a long overdue rewatch tonight.

The plot? Well its a little open to interpretation, as we follow Randle McMurphy. A con rejected from a ‘workers farm’ for assaulting too many people sent to an institution to be analysed to find out if he suffers from mental illness. The main thrust of the plot follows McMurphys various efforts to either escape, change the operations of the facility or to simply antagonize the wards chief of staff ‘Nurse Ratched’.

Only, McMurphy finds himself in too deep, when he finds out that the ward staff are the people who can decide when he’s free to go, and that being institutionalised is NOT a walk in the park.

The ‘open to interpretation’ element comes in with McMurphys mental health itself, you can choose to interpret the film literally, as in; McMurphy is a con man trying to pretend to be mentally ill to get a cushy ride, only to find the ride isnt quite as good as he figured. OR, you can interpret the film as all being from McMurphys perspective, and that he IS in fact mentally unwell, but warping the situation to how his reality percieves it. Theres evidence throughout the film to suggest both, and either honestly give entirely new readings on the situation.

To be blunt, this is a fascinating film and significantly more enjoyable the second time around when you know what happens and how things are played out, subtle moments that may go amiss the first time around are MUCH more significant on a rewatch and frankly. the whole things fantastic.

The scripts essentially a series of character pieces, but played with a real sense of complexity and care, its easy to dismiss these performances as ‘surface level’ but realistically, there is SO much more going onto these characters, and as the film slowly unravels, you see that complexity in all there different flavours.

The pacings a little stop/start for me, but its kept largely in check by a solid act structuring that never lets the characters rest for too long. Building to a totally unexpected ending that…while maybe a little softer than hoped for some, still has power in its metatext.

My only criticism is I feel had this been 10-15 minutes shorter, it would have been even more effective in what it was trying to achieve. The set pieces are nice, the conversational pieces extroadinary (Seriously, the dialogue here is next level). But I think one more pass through really would have just got it over the line for me.

Outside of that though? The direction is superb, no notes on my part its creative and emotionally satisfying, the cine equally solid, colourful bright, well composed with only a couple of shots really missing the mark for me. The edit is rock solid barring for a couple of continuity issues and the soundtrack, exquisit.

But, for me? the performances MAKE this movie. Outside of early appearences from Danny Devito and Christopher Lloyd (who here are exceptional) But this was an ‘introducing’ credit for Brad Dourif, who is just PHENOMONAL here. giving a genuine and realistic performance that rightfully earned him the ‘best supporting actor’ award.

This? is probably Jack Nicholsons greatest performance. a STORM of a character, he owns every single scene he’s in, works an ASTOUNDING range and takes the audience on a journey that I imagine seldom will forget. I sincerely think this role is the best thing he ever did, and given the work this man did with Kubrick? I think thats exceptional.

One Flew Over the Cuckoos nest is an emotional and engaging story of the mental health system in the US at a time where institutions like this were on the verge of widescale closure for the conditions they bred. A powerful feature film that stands alone and offers an astounding work to anyone willing to put the time in to see it. imperfect, but absolutely worth your time.

source https://letterboxd.com/tytdreviews/film/one-flew-over-the-cuckoos-nest/

Shannon Matthews: The Musical… The Movie!, 2024 – ★★

A painfully frustrating movie, ‘Shannon Matthews: The Musical – The Movie’ is a film that ultimately left me feeling quite hollow. As someone who vividly remembers the events of the 2008 hysteria around the dissapearence and discovery of Shannon Matthews, and the revelation that her mother, Karen Matthews, had masterminded a plot to hide her daughter, report her as missing and then claim the ‘fame’ and reward money for her discovery for herself. I was genuinely intreagued when this movie/musical film was announced for digital release across all major platforms. And I was even more intreagued when I found out the music was all (more or less) written and produced by the infamous ‘Kunt and the Gang’ who have been politically sniping the conservatives now for the better part of half a decade at least.

Unfortunately, the film really kind of fails to live up to its potential. While there was scope here to do a fairly self aware, scathing swipe at the media tornado that surrounded this, Karen Matthews and the people around her as a series of strange and tragic figures and an attempt to genuinely try to play to a more intelligent level of humour using the cases heavy level of detail to play on the circumstances themselves. Instead we find ourselves in a situation where, for most of the runtime, it feels like the film is punching down.

The script leans heavily into generalisations on working class families and is essentially a 90 minute joke at the expense of the working class, peppered thoroughly with ‘nonce’ jokes to boot. Its really only catered to two audiences ‘Centrist dads’ who would take this as overly risque, but would accept it as a ‘funny film with bite’ and Daily Mail readers, who would likely sneer at its depictions of ‘Poverty porn’ claiming ‘its funny because its true!’

I honestly didnt much care for the humour in this, and found myself laughing more at the surreal moments (theres a repeated motif of the detective who’s on the case having ‘Caves of Androzani’ style nightmare visions of Karen matthews head, which I thought was handled quite well) theres a couple of one liners, lone gags that did raise a dirty chuckle from me. But make no mistake, this is paedophile jokes and gags aimed at ‘picking on the povo’s’ for 90% of the runtime.

The tone is largely mean spirited, which can work if the film invites us in to ridicule these awful people while acknowleging they’re somehow intelligent, but the problem here is the film depicts Karen, her boyfriend and her partners brother as being too stupid to fully understand the consiquences of their actions. As a result, it feels less like we’re laughing at the situation and more that we’re being invited to jeer at people lower down on the social ladder.

The pacings a bit up and down, I found myself clock watching by the hour mark, and while the musical numbers do help kick things back into life, MOST of this film could be summed up as ‘Karen Matthews swears and makes grim monologues about her various ‘encounters’ while her boyfriend plays the stooge and makes overt pedo references’.

It ends rather abruptly too, and the resolution doesnt really feel nearly all that satisfying, which…given how these peoples ACTUAL real lives ended up as of 2024…is bizarre frankly. Karen Matthews went on to become a born again christian, and your telling me you DIDNT do a ‘virgin mary’ joke?…wild…honestly wild.

The entire script is very surface level on details, I actually found it quite dissapointing that an opportunity to REALLY make something controversial and interesting got boiled down to whats presented here honestly.

All the way through this film, I kept thinking back to the works of John Waters, and more specifically ‘Female Trouble’ which deals with similar themes. I feel like Waters film worked better because the characters are all larger than life, strange, but most importantly, cartoonish. They’re removed from reality. Here, the characters are simultaineously playing grotesque characatures of themselves, while also being bedded in a largely real story that actually happened. I think that contrast ultimately stops the audience from really fully investing in the work…it certainly did that with me.

The films biggest crime isnt that its offensive or shocking, its that its lazy. its not so much flogging a dead horse, more flogging the marrow. It picks 3-4 topics and mines them till theres literally nothing left. and thats a real pity as I feel the worlds sincerely missing an intelligent or considered take on controversial or sensationalist subjects. Something this film unfortunately doesnt do.

Adding to the woes, the direction is pretty mixed, an overeliance on greenscreen and plug ins left me feeling conflicted, as some moments were deleriously daft, while others felt remarkably cheap. there seems to be only 2-3 locations used in the entire film, with the rest of the production shooting outdoors (likely as a cost saving exercise) and the scenes dont really go much further than ‘locked off shot of living room in a wide, which we digitally zoom into via actual zooms, or hard cuts.’

The cine is overly basic, very little variety in shot types are present, and theres almost no moments of telling the narrative via the cinematography here at all. The colour correction is decidedly drab, with little in the way of style or distinction. and the edit isnt particularly tight, and doesnt utilize nearly enough B-roll, nor does it really get much more complex than cutting in and out of a wider framed shot.

On the performance front, the runaway star for me is Rob Kirtley, who plays the lead detective on the case. and he seems to know EXACTLY what kind of film this is, and the right tone to lean into on his animation and delivery. he’s bright, lands a significant proportion of his lines and feels like a Vic and Bob character got transferred into the film in some way. easily the best moments of the film are when he’s on screen, its just a shame the material he has to work with isnt as solid as his performance.

Samantha Hindman as well as directing stars as Karen Matthews here…and she’s passable in my opinion. VERY one note, essentially just playing a stereotypical gobby council estate woman. every 3rd word she says is a strong swear word, and intimate discussions and descriptions of her vagina wore thin after 10 minutes. In some regards, Id say she nailed the brief of what was asked of her…because…well, this IS what was asked of her…But at the same time, much like Kirtley, I feel like had she had better lines, or if her character was expanded on beyond a total surface level interpretation, there maybe would have been more for her to sink her teeth into.

The remaining cast are all playing it either comedically over-thick, basically doing ‘Gumby’ from Monty Python. or its cardboard. theres no middleground. and let me tell you, it gets insufferable VERY quickly.

Probably the best element of this whole production has to be the score, which was almost entirely written by ‘Kunt and the Gang’ and its pretty solid truthfully, with such hits as ‘You’re a Peadophile’ and ‘Shannon aint dead (she’s under my bed)’ theyre very one note, arnt particularly clever…But my GOD do they get the point across. catchy too. they’re not all great, some tracks are downright irritating. but when its THIS film, your talking about, you take what mercy’s you can get.

I can tell the EXACT audience this film is targeting, and it isnt me. had it been a bit clerverer in its lampooning and take downs, i’d have probably been a bit more invested in this. But the films SO wed to REPEATEDLY banging onto the same 3-4 topics across the whole runtime, it felt like being repeatedly smashed in the face with a barstool.

This film will only be offensive to the folks who would have been offended by even just the title of this film. But to me? this was just kind of dull, a half dozen funny moments sprinkled across a 90 minute runtime and very little else to show for it. I cant honestly recommend it. I probably wont watch it again, and I really wished it had been better.

source https://letterboxd.com/tytdreviews/film/shannon-matthews-the-musical-the-movie/

Beetlejuice, 1988 – ★★★★½

Well, it seems like everyones seen ‘Beetlejuice’ apart from me. Honestly my partner was quite surprised I hadnt given what goes on in the film and my general movie tastes. But it seems like noone ever recommended this one to me, because the assumption was i’d have already seen it. But I hadnt. So tonight we made a date and, yeh…Im kind of sad that I sat on this one for so long.

i’ll keep it short and sweet because…like I say…it seems like EVERYONES seen this movie before apart from me. But I really liked it. Tim Burton here is firing on all cylinders, Danny Elfmans score is pitch perfect. The casting is A+, rich and dense with ideas. The scripts rock solid for the most part, bringing a real sense of chaos to an already fairly chaotic cast of characters. Brimming with imagination and surprisingly fresh even 35-36 years after it initially came out.

I only really didnt like two things about this movie. One is the 3rd act finale feels INCREDIBLY rushed and improvised. I feel like the wedding scenario should have been better weaved into the story through the runtime, rather than dropped on the audience out of left field 15 minutes before the end of the film. The way the film resolves is also VERY rushed and doesnt really do a fair job of giving the audience ANYTHING to grab onto to explain how the hell anything in the final 10 minutes happens.

It doesnt really give a clear indication as to what the situation is between the Deetz and the Maitlands. it all felt a bit abrupt. I feel like 5-10 more minutes to really let that ending breath a bit more would have done this film the world of good.

The other issue is that Beetlejuice as a character isnt really that well explained. Now; I appreciate that he’s an oddity even by afterlife standards, and that going for the ‘hellraiser’ trope of having these paranormal super beings who rock up, do what they’ve got to do and then dissapear, leaving the aduience mystified IS a powerful trope when used well here…But because Beetlejuice is so ‘all over the place’ as a character, it kind of left me questioning the films own rules when he just rocks up, does a load of random stuff in a VERY over the top energetic way, and then dissapears without a trace. I dont want him overexplained. But I personally felt I needed a crumb or two more from him to really truely bed him in as a character.

Other than that, this is a pretty rock solid movie. I think its not something I could just put on and relax into such as Burtons ‘Ed Wood’, but if im in a particular headspace, I could really see myself enjoying this one again. Would almost certainly pair up well with ‘Forbidden Zone’ and I definitely recommend this one if you havent seen it already.

source https://letterboxd.com/tytdreviews/film/beetlejuice/